*ShoutBox

 
 

Author Topic: The lifting of the curse (women only, or at least: not for men if they're squeamish)  (Read 484 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Sub aqua, sub aqua maledicere possunt.
  • Location: Germany, near Berlin
Great and very funny article in my German weekly (paper version), unfortunately, it's not free online:
Viele Feministinnen feiern Regelschmerzen und verschmierte Unterhosen. Unsere Autorin findet: Keine Frau muss heutzutage noch bluten. Ein Plädoyer gegen die Menstruation
DIE ZEIT · zeit.de


The gist of it is here, however:
Can women eliminate menstrual bleeding without problems?
Nature · nature.com


tl;dr
If you're on the pill, there's no need whatsoever to stop taking it for a week every three weeks: menstruation is your body's garbage disposal. Pill -> no ovulation -> no garbage. Apparently, it really is that simple. So, why on earth did I feel obliged to menstruate while I was on the pill? Seems one of the guys who developed the pill in the first place was a fervent Catholic who thought it would make the Pope happy to know women were still bleeding as per God's order (that last bit of info's only in the German article). So, they told doctors that's how the pill was to be taken, and that's what the doctors in turn told their patients.

Please tell me you hadn't known about this, either - I felt so, so stupid when I read the German article. Now I see the English article is about 10 years old and feel even stupider.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3403
  • Lest: www.liberationnews.org
  • Location: Kalifornien, in der Nähe von San Francisco
  • Native language(s): English
Alharacas,

I started reading that article in Die Zeit, but it cuts off and says you can read it for free, but it`s a 4-week test free period. Sounds like you have to register for it and then they start auto-billing you unless you cancel. Oh, well.
ROT MACHT STARK! Nur tote Fische schwimmen mit dem Strom.  http://www.dielinke-aurich.de/

Irena

  • Guest
I'd heard about this before. Don't remember when. Anyway, I've never been on the pill, and so I haven't paid much attention.

Offline

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • I just say stuff.
  • Location: Bohemia
I'd heard about it but in countries where birth control isn't free, this stuff can be quite expensive. You'd have to buy extra pills every month because a normal package only contains 21. So either you bleed physically or financially.
Tetris taught me that when you try to fit in, you'll disappear.

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
I thought the pill brought some side effects like increased chance of stroke and cancer, and the practice of taking it to completely avoid menstruation made the chances even worse.  Am I ill-informed?

Seems like such a trade with Mother Nature would be too easy to come free.

The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!

Truman Overby

  • Guest
I thought the pill brought some side effects like increased chance of stroke and cancer, and the practice of taking it to completely avoid menstruation made the chances even worse.  Am I ill-informed?

Seems like such a trade with Mother Nature would be too easy to come free.
And deep vein thrombosis.

Offline

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • I just say stuff.
  • Location: Bohemia
@Neal

I think you're right about the related health risks in general, at least that's what they say, but the chances don't seem to increase with skipping menstruation, which isn't real menstruation anyway. Once you're on the pill, there's no such thing as a real period. In terms of the related risks, one has to be aware of how biased the information may be because the pharmaceutical companies want you to take it and certain groups don't. It is said to increase the risk of some types of cancer while actually significantly decreasing the risk of others. The heart- and blood vessel-related risk seems to vary greatly depending on what pill you're taking and whether there are any other risk factors (pre-existing medical condition, smoking etc.). It's probably not great for the environment but I have a feeling this is not the type of argument you or Jerry would want to use :)
Tetris taught me that when you try to fit in, you'll disappear.

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
I don't really have an overarching religious argument against birth control, mostly because when it was a real concern in my life I wasn't listening to religious arguments.  It would seem hypocritical to get on a high horse to other people about it now.  I am sympathetic to those who don't use it for various (usually religious) reasons.

Because of the health risks when I was first married I left the decision to use or not use the pill up to my wife.  I didn't feel like I had the right to insist on it.  At the time -1989 - the doctor told her she could "double up" the month of our wedding so she didn't have to worry having her period on her wedding day or during the honeymoon.  So the idea was there even then.

Speaking of birth control when I got married my mother chimed in with her combination condom/rhythm method advice (which actually worked pretty well) but let me know I was born because the drugstore wasn't open on Sunday, and my father told her God wouldn't let her conceive on the Lord's Day.

Thanks mom.
The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • I just say stuff.
  • Location: Bohemia
So, why on earth did I feel obliged to menstruate while I was on the pill?
I think Alharacas touched an interesting topic here. It could be because bleeding once a month creates the illusion that what's happening inside your body is still "natural" and "right". Some women, if they stopped having periods, would go "hallelujah" of course, but some might think "crap, what have I done to my body?" So psychology and marketing might have played some role in this.

The belief that women are obliged or entitled to having a period is not just a Catholic thing, though. I think it's strongly embedded in the society because I could see its effects when I was working with children who have special needs. I don't want to go into too much detail but the "blessing" often turns into an absolute nightmare for both the girl and her parents/carers, there's pain and mood swings, both often resulting in self-harm, confusion, mess... the mess... words cannot describe how horribly wrong things can go. And the noble, high-minded people who say it is the girls' right to go through all this are never there to deal with the consequences.
Tetris taught me that when you try to fit in, you'll disappear.
Informative Informative x 2 View List

Irena

  • Guest
Yikes, Nikola. So what do they do with those girls? Nothing...?

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
This idea that actual menstruation, "the bleeding" is part of "The Curse" is actually a very new idea to me, and I have been in religious circles (but not Catholic) all my life.

Hypothetically speaking, Eve was a fully functioning woman and menstruation itself was part of that.  Or wasn't it?  Is is Roman Catholic dogma that Eve never menstruated before The Fall?  If so I never heard that before.

The exact nature of the Genesis curse on Eve seems to have more to do with sin affecting relationships between husband and wife, mother and child than anything physical.

If I was a woman being reminded every month that "Eve sinned first!", wouldn't make me feel closer to God.  I don't think menstruation was part of The Curse.  Women just call it that.
The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
Nikola
I can certainly understand how that could be horrible, but I imagine the doctors and hospitals are stuck.  Do these special needs kids have the ability to choose between medical options?  Are the choices made by parents?  Why would religious organizations pressure to maintain the fertility of people too ill to make medical choices for themselves?  I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm quite sure it did.  I just don't understand the vested interest.  If a person is too young or too disabled to make the medical choice, then by definition any sexual act would not be consensual.  Why insist on fertility?  Just so their pro life arguments remain completely consistent?
The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Sub aqua, sub aqua maledicere possunt.
  • Location: Germany, near Berlin
I thought the pill brought some side effects like increased chance of stroke and cancer, and the practice of taking it to completely avoid menstruation made the chances even worse.  Am I ill-informed?

Seems like such a trade with Mother Nature would be too easy to come free.
And deep vein thrombosis.

True. But on the other hand, celibacy is the only method of birth control guaranteed to be both reliable and harmless. :)

Offline

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • I just say stuff.
  • Location: Bohemia
In the UK, the girl's parents can request some medical intervention, usually the prescription of birth control, but the permission may not be granted, and often isn't unless the girl has some serious medical condition.

This sums it up: "No perfect strategy exists to suppress menstruation in this population. Girls must be allowed to go through puberty before any attempt is made to stop periods."
"There is a real need for a fuller discussion of this difficult issue and a vital requirement for studies in this area to investigate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, adverse effects, psychological benefits and harms, and patient and family views."

It's not so much about being able to reproduce but the right to go through puberty with everything it involves is definitely a big thing in the UK. The doctors will induce puberty in children artificially if they haven't gone through it by a certain age. Once the child turns 16, parents have less responsibility but also don't have as much say anymore and it becomes very hard to argue with the "professionals".
Tetris taught me that when you try to fit in, you'll disappear.
Informative Informative x 1 View List

Offline

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • I just say stuff.
  • Location: Bohemia
If I was a woman being reminded every month that "Eve sinned first!", wouldn't make me feel closer to God.  I don't think menstruation was part of The Curse.  Women just call it that.
I don't know how serious Alharacas was when she used the word curse, I wouldn't use it myself. It can be a real nuisance, though.
Tetris taught me that when you try to fit in, you'll disappear.

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
Wow I never knew that Nikola.  It seems in the US you would be fighting 'high minided' religious groups while in the UK you are fighting the government.

@Alharacas
It didn't seem harmless at the time :-)
The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Sub aqua, sub aqua maledicere possunt.
  • Location: Germany, near Berlin
This idea that actual menstruation, "the bleeding" is part of "The Curse" is actually a very new idea to me, and I have been in religious circles (but not Catholic) all my life.

Hypothetically speaking, Eve was a fully functioning woman and menstruation itself was part of that.  Or wasn't it?  Is is Roman Catholic dogma that Eve never menstruated before The Fall?  If so I never heard that before.

The exact nature of the Genesis curse on Eve seems to have more to do with sin affecting relationships between husband and wife, mother and child than anything physical.

If I was a woman being reminded every month that "Eve sinned first!", wouldn't make me feel closer to God.  I don't think menstruation was part of The Curse.  Women just call it that.

Interesting, Neal. I'd always taken Gen. 3.16 (In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children) to include menstruation. It's part and parcel of having children, isn't it?
Female animals seem not only to have a lot less trouble giving birth, they don't tend to tearfully curl up with a hot water bottle either, do they?
But yes, also, "No more that time of the month" would not have had the same ring to it, would it? ;)

Offline

  • The Grand Pooh Bah
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • I'm the funny one
  • Location: New York
  • Native language(s): English
It is a tough one to translate and different versions handle it differently.  "In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children", and the described inequality in the husband/wife relationship always seemed to me to be more figurative than literal.  But of course the literal translation is the safer one and might be the better. 

There are a lot of factors to consider that are not clear, and would require speculation.  What was human sex and reproduction like before the Fall?  Some people think intercourse itself was the 'forbidden fruit'.  I am more interested in what the Roman Catholic Church taught about it.  Was actual menstruation a sign of the curse or was it pain in childbirth?  How was it handled in the Convents?  What were the lay people taught?

I can say from an Evangelical Protestant perspective we were taught the pain thing, but not the blood thing.  In my own thinking I went beyond pain and thought about how sin affected relationships - in other words 'bringing forth children' being more than just the birth process.  I have done some reading all the way back to the Reformation guys, people who would love to stick women in a red tent at that time of the month, but nothing about the blood being part of the curse. 

Back to the OP, when I was first married it was known to be possible to use Birth Control pills to skip a period once in a while.  When my daughter went on them because of her irregular/painful periods she was told she could get the pills on a whole month basis - no period at all.  That was about 6-8 years ago.   
The end isn't "nigh".  We are already in it, knee-high!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3403
  • Lest: www.liberationnews.org
  • Location: Kalifornien, in der Nähe von San Francisco
  • Native language(s): English
I bet no one thought I would chime in on this thread, but since everyone is talking so much I felt like saying something. First, I thought the pill functioned by tricking a women‘s body into thinking it was already pregnant, thus blocking another pregnancy. So, the pill plays with hormones I suppose. No medicines are without side effects and I guess it should come as no surprise that the pill has some of those. But, I will admit, I never even thought about the pill`s effect on menstration. I would have thought it would have blocked menstration, but I can see the developers of the pill (late 1950s maybe?)  figuring that would not be a wanted side-effect. So, I will say if you have a normal-like period on the pill it‘s fairly amazing. I could see that as something women would want. A pill to prevent pregnancy but still make them feel like everything else were normal.

I don`t know about all this religious stuff about a „curse“ and all associated with women having babies, but I will say women did come out with the short of the stick, as they say, when it came to the baby-making procedures. If it were up to me, or Jerry or Neal or probably any other man on the planet to go though what women go through to have babies, this planet would have died out a long time ago. We`d be about as populated as Pluto (that makes me recall how a few years ago someone discovered that Pluto wasn‘t a planet but a swiriling mass of gases or something, and I saw this bumper sticker that read, „Pluto. You‘ll always be a planet to me.“)

So yes, the ladies have my sympathies on the menstral cycle issue. And, if that were‘t bad enough, I wonder if Neal or Jerry ever watched a childbirth? I watched my first being born, my daughter back in 1991. The hospital was sort of pushing dad‘s being in the room at the time, for some reason. I should have told them I‘d sit this one out. But, I didn‘t and had to watch. Well, it was an eye-opener I will say. My ex-wife was not one to go in for „natural“ child birth, so she wanted all the pain relief they could give her. And, even with an epidural block and whatever else they could give her, she was literally screaming her head off, yelling „doctor, get it out of me!“ And, it was a very messy affair I have to say. There was sort of that „ewe“-factor I got,  like „I don‘t think I need to watch this.“ I think all I was probably was thinking was, „better her than me on that bed.“

ROT MACHT STARK! Nur tote Fische schwimmen mit dem Strom.  http://www.dielinke-aurich.de/
Bad Spelling Bad Spelling x 1 View List