Steve, I don't claim to be a German speaker but it's been disproven years ago that JFK did not say that he's a jelly doughnut. The wording was twisted to make a joke or to embarrass the man. I'd like to have Susanne set this straight.
NEAL! What is happening to my posts? I posted a detailed reply to this earlier and poof! It’s no where to be found!
So, now I have to start all over again. Ugh.
It was probably too long anyway, like most of my posts, so I’ll summarize (I did really want Alharacas to see it because she’s the expert). This is not starting out to be a good day and I think my blood pressure is going up! And I probably need another blood pressure pill and should take another tranquilizer!
Anyway, yes Jerry there has been a controversy about this for the last 40 years. The controversy was popularized in the 1980s when we all laughed and said “JFK made a fool of himself in Berlin with his “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech. He just said he was a jelly donut.” (I love Berliner Pfannkuchen by the way. I always buy them with coffee, but in a bakery I go to in Berlin, but they just call them a Berliner).
I read both the German and English Wikipedia articles on it and looked at a few other sources. Obviously, no one in the crowd thought JFK was referring to himself as a jelly donut, so there was no misunderstanding. In fact, JFK didn’t even speak any language other than English, and certainly not German, so he had professional translators write the line and a couple of other lines in German he interjected into his English speech. He wrote notes of how he thought they should be pronounced (he had a very heavy American accent- in fact he uttered another line or two in German that I could barely understand because of the accent was so heavy).
What JFK meant to say was he felt in solidarity with the people of Berlin. So, his speech writer should have said THAT in German and not relied on that lousy translation (my opinion). When you think about it, it would have been equally as confusing and wrong had he said “Ich bin Berliner” because he didn’t live there, and that would have sounded silly too.
These are two things I culled from the internet:
“Kennedy’s famous line was penned by someone who was raised within Berlin itself and was an accomplished and highly regarded translator in his own right. In proclaiming “Ich bin ein Berliner,” therefore, JFK was no more referring to himself as a pastry than someone calling himself a “New Yorker” would have been understood by Americans as styling himself to be a magazine or a town car. Just as “I’m American” and “I’m an American” are both correct, so are “Ich bin ein Berliner” and “Ich bin Berliner.” (In fact, some German speakers would regard the former to be the more correct for someone who was speaking figuratively, as Kennedy was.)”
I personally disagree with the author, but maybe that’s just my preference. (I’ve just never heard anyone say “Ich bin ein Berliner” before or anything like it.)
Another quote is telling;
“Despite widespread claims to the contrary in most German grammars and textbooks, it is not incorrect to use an indefinite article before an indication of a person's origin, profession. As explained in the Duden-Grammatik: "Der indefinite Artikel wird beim prädikativen Nominativ [...] oft weggelassen, wenn damit die Zugehörigkeit zu einer sozial etablierten und anerkannten Gruppe (Nationalität, Herkunft, Beruf, Funktion, Weltanschauung, Religion, gesellschaftlicher Status usw.) angegeben wird (a). Zum Teil bestehen regionale Unterschiede im Gebrauch; ein strikter Standard hat sich nicht herausgebildet (b): (a) Sie wird _ Hochbauzeichnerin. Er bleibt _ Junggeselle. (b) Er ist (ein) Engländer. Sie ist (eine) Heidelbergerin." (Duden-Grammatik, 8. ed. 2009, p. 331”
Duden might say that the indefinite article is “often” omitted with certain nouns, but that was not what I was taught in the 70s and 80s. I was taught it was always omitted with certain nouns and it is not optional to omit it. And, I’ve never heard anyone use an indefinite article not followed by an adjective before those certain sorts of nouns, either in writing or in speech. Not once. The rule is if the noun is not preceded by an adjective, the indefinite article ein or eine is omitted as long as the noun refers to origin, profession, an official position, a worldview, a religion, or a social status. Then examples are given. That’s what I learned and all I’ve ever heard when native speakers speak and I’ve never seen it written otherwise, ever.